<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[What do you like about Audiograbber?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">This question also serves for testing the new support system.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.audiograbber.org/topic/295/what-do-you-like-about-audiograbber</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2026 22:10:17 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://community.audiograbber.org/topic/295.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 18:04:23 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to What do you like about Audiograbber? on Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:44:18 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">The line-in sampling function can automatically split recordings from LPs into separate tracks, im like it most ....</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.audiograbber.org/post/459</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.audiograbber.org/post/459</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[BrandonSmith]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 13 Sep 2010 11:44:18 GMT</pubDate></item><item><title><![CDATA[Reply to What do you like about Audiograbber? on Thu, 22 Apr 2010 01:58:35 GMT]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">The interface is nice, it gets the job done, small foot print, multi language, freeware, easy to configure.</p>
]]></description><link>https://community.audiograbber.org/post/458</link><guid isPermaLink="true">https://community.audiograbber.org/post/458</guid><dc:creator><![CDATA[[[global:guest]]]]></dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 22 Apr 2010 01:58:35 GMT</pubDate></item></channel></rss>